Archive

Posts Tagged ‘US DOJ’

Digital Due Process and the 3rd Branch

April 1, 2010 1 comment

This week, we welcome a new member to the tech policy family – Digital Due Process, a concept conceived and birthed by an extensive coalition of academics, corporations and think tanks.  The goal of the effort is to reform certain aspects of our electronic surveillance laws, specifically the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), that regulate how the government gains access to private data.  By doing so, the coalition hopes for legislation that will guarantee a certain amount of due process and privacy protection for the vast amounts of data – emails, photos, music – that private citizens upload to the cloud every day through email and social networking services.

A group of notable academics, companies (AOL, Google and Microsoft) and think tanks (EFF, CDT, PFF) working together is news in and of itself.  It’s clear however that the time has come to reform ECPA, a statute that was first passed in 1986, several years before commercial Internet activity was a reality (for more, check out the coalition’s white paper or my previous blog on the subject).  The law has simply become – in the words of both Senator Patrick Leahy and the EFF’s Kevin Bankston – “woefully outdated.”

Senator Leahy weighed in of course, because the goal of this effort is to get Congress to pass legislation that will reform the ECPA provisions having to do with government access to data.  According to his press release, Senator Leahy welcomes the opportunity to explore the privacy and law enforcement concerns with the current version of ECPA. It’s unlikely, however, that ECPA reform legislation will be enacted this year – with the mid-term elections looming, and with other tech policy issues such as net neutrality still simmering on Congress’ back burner.  It’s also uncertain what support, if any, the coalition’s proposals will have from law enforcement. For the most part, the coalition’s proposals focus on stored data – and will not interfere with the government’s ability to gain access to real-time communications under the Wiretap Act.

But, as Declan McCullagh points out, law enforcement’s position may differ from the administration’s position, as echoed by Candidate Obama in his campaign promise to strengthen privacy protections in the digital age.

By the way, the coalition’s proposals, which you can read in depth here, focus on government access to both electronic communications and important data such as subscriber information.  It also proposes to update ECPA’s requirements for access to location data – particularly important given the DOJ’s argument, made recently, that it does not need a warrant to track cell phone location data.

What I find intriguing is the precedent this effort could establish in defining a right to privacy for data – regardless if access is by the government or by a third party. In his campaign promise on privacy, the President also talked about using “the power of technology to hold government and business accountable for violations of personal privacy.”  Indeed, if the coalition’s efforts are successful, some of its members may themselves be subject to lawsuits with ECPA-based claims.  Congressional legislation will likely include some provision for regulating access to data by private parties, not just government.  This could lead to expanded causes of action against some of the very companies that are advocating for ECPA reform. Perhaps these companies realize and accept this inevitability– because even with the threat of additional litigation and regulatory actions in the near term, the ultimate goal is a reality where people are aware of the value of their personal data and are also willing to entrust that data to the provider who guards it most carefully.  As many of the coalition member companies argue, user trust is the keystone to a functional digital ecosystem.

Congress has not really tackled the issue of data privacy (yet), but the other two branches of government have encountered it in some form or the other. The administration continues to forge ahead with its ideal of individualized control over personal data – as seen most recently in the FCC’s Broadband plan, which contains a number of provisions aimed at giving private citizens more control over their online data profiles.  On the other end of the spectrum, courts continue to wrestle with the 4th Amendment third-party doctrine, and whether there is an expectation of privacy in data that an individual creates, and then hands over to a third party (ISP, etc.) for distribution or storage.

How will Congress handle the issue?  Painfully and slowly, I suspect.  At least the debate has started.  Let the shaping begin.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: , ,

Google Wants to Buy Yelp – Are Regulators in Sync?

December 18, 2009 1 comment

Rumours that Google wants to acquire Yelp (for $1.5 billion) hit the blogosphere and newswaves earlier today. While local advertisers may be part of the attraction (Google’s Place Pages for maps, etc.), I think the bigger story here is how Google continues to fortify its social search assets.  A smart move as social networking – with its mines of user profile data – continues to grow in relevance for online advertisers.  Commentators, most notably Wired, have mused that Google’s real competitor is Facebook (it’s social, not relevant search that’s key).  If you take that view, this acquisition makes total sense. Yelp – with 9 million uniques and $30 million in revenue for 2009  -is growing at a rate of 80%, while that same number for Citysearch, its nearest competitor, is around zero.  Yelp is an important acquisition for Google, as it builds its social search platform to compete with Facebook and others for online ad dollars.

The interesting question here is how regulators will view the Google-Yelp transaction. Will they view it in isolation, or will they analyze how this deal fits in with the seven other Google acquisitions currently pending with regulatory authorities? The ramifications are huge – particularly for the small, but growing mobile advertising market. Especially, since one of those 6 other transactions is Google’s bid to acquire AdMob, one of the largest providers of mobile advertising (see my post; Scott Cleland’s blog on antitrust concerns with this deal are also worth a read). Yelp is already on your app phone of choice – including phones featuring Google’s Android – and the synergies are almost poetic.  Plus, there are the persistent rumors that Nexus One (the Google phone), will be released next year.

All of this suggests that regulatory agencies need to be working very closely on merger reviews of technology deals in the coming months.  Coordination on these merger reviews needs to happen both between the agencies – here the DOJ, FCC and FTC – and with state Attorneys General that choose to review these transactions.  Coordination is key to the outcome of a process that will impact continued innovation and competition in the communications and technology industries.  Perhaps too, we will gain some insight into how the tech friendly Obama Administration really views merger policy in dynamic markets.

US DOJ Awards Grants to Combat IP Piracy

August 27, 2009 Leave a comment

The National Journal reports that the US DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs will award nearly $2 million to law enforcement agencies for the purpose of “identifying and stopping criminal activity associated with intellectual property piracy.” Notably, the grantees include state and local entities such as the cities of Los Angeles and New York, and the National Association of Attorneys General.  They also include non-profits like the National White Collar Crime Center. Details in today’s Tech Daily Dose.